|
Interesting controversy in Kentucky given the recent discussion of the Catholic Charities adoption skirmish in Massachusetts:
http://news.findlaw.com/ap/o/51/04-25-2006/4c800009472731cd.html
Does anyone have any more information on this story beyond the short AP summary?
The governor’s rationale for refusing to veto the bill was what struck me: He apparently claims that since the money came from coal severances rather than taxation of individuals, the EC violation is somehow diminished. To this layman, that seems a weak argument. Any lawyers out there know if there is there any precedent for this line of reasoning?
Andrew Wyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
