Thanks for the scorecard.  It is helpful!

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 2:33 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Michigan RFRA?


        Reid v. Kenowa Hills Public Schools, 261 Mich.App. 17, 680
N.W.2d 62 (2004), seems to adopt the Sherbert/Yoder strict scrutiny
model as a matter of Michigan constitutional law.  On the other hand, it
relies on an earlier state supreme court decision that rested on a
hybrid rights Free Exercise Clause theory, and doesn't expressly discuss
the Sherbert vs. Smith issue, so perhaps it might not be the strongest
precedent on this score.

        Here's the scorecard, as I see it:

        RFRA statutes (12):  AZ, CT, FL, ID, IL, MO, NM, OK, PA, RI, SC,
TX.
        RFRA constitutional amendment (1):  AL.
        Sherbert/Yoder under state constitution (12):  AK, IN, ME, MA,
MI, MN, MT, NC, OH, VT, WA, WI.
        Smith under state constitution (4):  MD, NJ, OR, TN.
        Ambiguous, leaning in favor of Smith (1):  KS.
        Uncertainty expressly noted (4):  CA, HI, NY, UT.
        Nothing said (16):  AR, CO, DE, GA, IA, KY, LA, MS, NE, NV, NH,
ND, SD, VA, WV, WY.

        Eugene



________________________________

        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 7:17 AM
        To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
        Subject: Re: Michigan RFRA?
        
        
        There are 13 state rfras; Michigan is not one of them.  
        
        
        Marci
        
        
        
        Marci A. Hamilton
        Visiting Professor of Public Affairs
        Kathleen and Martin Crane Senior Research Fellow
        Program in Law and Public Affairs
        Woodrow Wilson School
        Princeton University
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Ed Brayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        To: Religionlaw Listserv <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
        Sent: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 1:38 am
        Subject: Michigan RFRA?
        
        
        Does anyone on the list know if Michigan has passed their own
version of RFRA? If so, can you tell me where to find it in the Michigan
code? Thanks.
         
        Ed Brayton
        _______________________________________________
        To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
        To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
        http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
        
        Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be
viewed as private.  
        Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can 
        read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly)
forward the 
        messages to others.
        
________________________________

        Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL
Mail
<http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/index.htm?nc
id=AOLAOF00020000000970> !
        

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly
or wrongly) forward the messages to others.

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to