Leslie Griffin's excellent textbook has a chapter on this which includes a case from the European Court of Human Rights on Turkey's secular interest in banning religious clothing in some settings, and other materials. I also like to include the South African Constitution's provisions on religious freedom as well as the ICCPR.
Steve On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Rick Duncan <nebraskalawp...@yahoo.com>wrote: > I would like to add a comparative unit to my Religion and the Constitution > class. Can anyone on the list recommend materials covering, say, the French > approach to non-establishment? Is there an article or a case or two that I > could assign my students to give them some insights into the French approach > to non-establishment (perhaps something good on the head scarf issue)? Off > list responses are fine. > > Thanks. > > Rick Duncan > Welpton Professor of Law > University of Nebraska College of Law > Lincoln, NE 68583-0902 > > > "And against the constitution I have never raised a storm,It's the > scoundrels who've corrupted it that I want to reform" --Dick Gaughan (from > the song, Thomas Muir of Huntershill) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or > wrongly) forward the messages to others. > -- Prof. Steven Jamar Howard University School of Law Associate Director, Institute of Intellectual Property and Social Justice (IIPSJ) Inc.
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
