*Smith* is arguably the biggest step minimalizing free exercise and I would not consider Scalia a secularist. So, Doug, I fear I must be missing the import of your statement.
Steve On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Douglas Laycock <layco...@umich.edu> wrote: > Intuitively, it would matter a lot more whether there are many faiths or > only one. The current US alignment of secularists minimizing free exercise > and conservative believers minimizing disestablishment is a very recent > development. > > -- Prof. Steven Jamar Howard University School of Law Associate Director, Institute of Intellectual Property and Social Justice (IIPSJ) Inc.
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
