In an interesting new lawsuit, a Missouri legislator (suing as an employee of the state) seeks on religious liberty grounds the ability to obtain a health insurance policy from his employer that does not cover contraception, sterilization or abortifacients. He particularly objects to coverage of these in his policy for his 3 daughters, age 12, 18 and 19. More on Religion Clause blog-- http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2013/08/new-contraceptive-coverage-challenge.html
Howard Friedman
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
