Thanks Jean - I was trying to avoid getting into a discussion as to the particulars of the contraception (which is the vehicle for this particular case) by relying on Justice Alito's statement on page 9, footnote 7, which dismissed the dispute over what the drugs actually do (distinguishing between how the company and regulators viewed the drugs). In other words, if the company owners believe it causes abortion, or the company owners believe that wearing blue hats on a Monday attracts evil spirits, the Court would apply the same analysis. _______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.