In light of yesterday's statements by leaders of the LDS Church, it looks
like Utah could well become the first post-Windsor state to pair new
statewide antidicrimination protections for LGBT people with new religious
liberty legislation. In trying to get up to speed on the landscape in the
state, I found this lengthy article from the Deseret News to be quite
informative:

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865620495/LDS-statement-could-move-Utah-nondiscrimination-religious-freedom-debate-forward.html

If I'm reading the current pending legislation (SB100, HB66, and HJR5)
correctly, religious organizations, individuals acting on behalf of
religious organizations, and government officials would be exempt from
performing or solemnizing marriages that are contrary to their faith. But
the current legislative proposals would not extend such exemptions into the
commercial realm, either for corporate entities or non-corporate business
owners. However, the article notes:

Meantime, other legislators are keeping under wraps proposals dealing with
"religious conscience" issues in business, employment and property rights.
Such legislation would seek to protect from prosecution or lawsuits people
like photographers or bakers who refuse to provide services for gay
weddings because of their religious beliefs.

Lawmakers also might unveil a state version of the federal Religious
Freedom Restoration Act. The 1993 act requires federal laws to accommodate
individuals' religious beliefs unless there is a compelling interest at
stake that can't be attained through other means.

In short, several proposals already on the table, and several others in the
works, in a state where legislative action on both the LGBT rights front
and the religious liberty front might well move forward.

- Jim
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to