It will make the license a collector’s item.
Eugene
From: James Oleske [mailto:jole...@lclark.edu]
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 9:15 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Cc: Volokh, Eugene; Dellinger, Walter; Douglas Laycock; Howard Wasserman;
conlawp...@lists.ucla.edu; Michael Dorf; Samuel Bagenstos
Subject: Re: Kim Davis announcement about what she'll do at work today
Update:
Unlike the licenses previously issued by deputy clerk Brian Mason to same-sex
couples, which included "in the office of Rowan County," the license he issued
this morning has the words "in the office of" crossed out and the language
"Pursuant to the Federal Court Order" in the place where ordinarily the names
of the clerk and the county would be inserted (image here:
https://twitter.com/alanblinder/status/643447815641899008).
So Davis appears to have imposed her position from the deposition (that both
her name AND the name of her county must be removed from the form). As several
of us have noted on the religionlaw list, this approach raises both
establishment and equal protection questions, but the more immediate question
is whether it is consistent with Judge Bunning's non-interference order.
- Jim
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Marty Lederman
<lederman.ma...@gmail.com<mailto:lederman.ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
summarizing:
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2015/09/kim-davis-developments.html
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.
