For what it is worth, pretty much all of the leading public law scholars (Whittington, Rogers Smith, Gillman, Epstein, Segal) have law review pices. Same for historians (Rakove, Cornell, etc). ________________________________ From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] on behalf of Conkle, Daniel O. [con...@indiana.edu] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 11:33 AM To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: Research Queries
A colleague of mine, who is working on an interdisciplinary book, has asked me for ideas on the following: First, to reply to the criticism that law reviews are not respected by other disciplines, I am searching for examples of important scholarship published in law reviews by social scientists, historians or religion scholars rather than academic lawyers. Second, to reply to the criticism that legal scholars have no influence outside their discipline, I am searching for examples where social scientists, historians or religion scholars have recognized the contribution to knowledge in their fields made by legal scholars with no additional credentials. If anyone has thoughts that I might pass along to him, please let me know, off-list. Thanks in advance. Dan ************************************************ Daniel O. Conkle Robert H. McKinney Professor of Law Indiana University Maurer School of Law Bloomington, Indiana 47405 (812) 855-4331 fax (812) 855-0555 e-mail con...@indiana.edu<mailto:con...@indiana.edu> ************************************************ _______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
