Not using the frame syncs....using the actual RF carrier!

Gregg R. Lengling, W9DHI, Retired
Administrator http://www.milwaukeehdtv.org
K2/100 S#3075 KX1 S# 57
Politics is the art of appearing candid and completely open, while
concealing as much as possible.   -States: The Bene Gesserit View
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Rod Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:55 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: crystal alignment (how accurate is
accurate)

Used to be...  In the good old days before frame syncs, you could wait
until the local affiliate was in network programming and you had a REAL
good 3.58 reference.  Not so anymore.  3.579545 was an easy number to
remember for some reason... ;^)

73 de N1FNE

-----Original Message-----
From: Gregg Lengling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:07 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: crystal alignment (how accurate is
accurate)

Another couple ways to calibrate:

I use a GPS receiver with an 10 meg output to calibrate my service
monitor.


Before GPS just find out if you have a TV station that is using a
Rubidium
Standard for their frequency.  Here in Milwaukee Ch4 uses one and we
always
used it to check calibration in the field, the standard was at 67.24
MHz,  a
lot better than using 10 megs....much higher order of precision.


Gregg R. Lengling, W9DHI, Retired
Administrator http://www.milwaukeehdtv.org
K2/100 S#3075 KX1 S# 57
Politics is the art of appearing candid and completely open, while
concealing as much as possible.   -States: The Bene Gesserit View
 


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:04 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: crystal alignment (how accurate is
accurate)

Ian, you should have time standard frequencies in Australia on 5 10 and
15 
MHz. If you have a secondary receiver, tune in the 10 MHz and compare it
to
the 
output of the 10 MHz timebase in your service monitor.

This has  been one of my obsessions for a while now, to find a way of
more 
accurately setting my 10 MHz timebase in my service monitor.

Zero beating with our WWV signal will only get you within a cycle or so.

(i.e., one cycle off at 10 MHz equals 40 hertz error at 400 MHz) And
then
there's 
trying to find a time when the signal is strong and doesn't fade too
much. 
Since I live about 50 miles south of Ft Collins you would think I would
have
a 
strong signal all the time, but no.

So I figure there must be a way to use a scope to compare two audio
signals 
(X/Y like we do with PL tones) and be able to set it more accurately. I
have

tried comparing the 1000 cycle audio tone from an external receiver when
I 
generate a signal from the service monitor I kc off frequency from WWV.
Then

comparing that to the 1kc tone generated from the monitors own PL tone
generator 
(phase locked to the 10 MHz time bases). You should be able to see a
slow
drift 
between the two on the oscilloscope but so far no success, too much
noise to

see much.

Does someone have a way of getting closer than 1 cycle? (no I haven't
bought

a GPS timebase receiver yet but have drooled over them on Ebay.

I've always wondered if a tuned RF receiver using 10 MHz crystals for IF

filters would give you a strong 10 MHz carrier that could be used for
calibration.

Hopefully this is still somewhat on topic since we all need to set our 
repeaters on frequency.

Art - KC7GF
Golden, CO



 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 






 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 






 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 






 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to