Title: Message
IIRC, you add a cap and remove a cap in the 40 watt PA to change from 406-420 to 450-470.  It makes a slight improvement in power output in the 440-450 range if you make the changes.  You won't let the smoke out even if you don't make the mods.  I have the GE mod notes covering the conversion (somewhere).
 
                                    --- Jeff
 
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:16 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] GE M2 UHF 40Watt PA section question

I am putting together a UHF repeater on 443.775 (+) and acquired a 40 watt (Intermediate) PA deck from an unknown source and started to visually check it out versus the schematic diagram. 
 
Now, the GE manual (LBI30201) identifies my pa deck as 19D321347G5 Rev N.  This matches the yellow label on the IPA deck.  So far so good.  However, the G5 board is listed in the manual as 402-420 and also lists G9 for 420-450 MHz - the same part number except its a group 9 rather than a group 5 and a different part of the band.   Hmmm.  Will I get my 40 watts from this group 5 deck on 443.775??
 
On the same page of the manual, there is a components change table listed by frequency band (LL=406-450, L=450-470, M=470-494, H=494-512).  
 
Whoa there!  the (G)roups are 406-420, and 420-450, but the components don't change between 406 and450??   I scanned the detailed parts list and found nothing that indicates a difference in parts between the 406-420 and 420-450 band.  
 
The only discrepancy that I found is that C257 is not installed on my PA deck and the components table says it should be there.  I checked with my source and all of his 411 MHz PA decks (40 and 100 watt) do not have C257 installed.    I'ts a bear to get at the spot on the PWB for C257.  It's right above the black test socket J5.
 
The big question is"  What am I missing here?  What makes UHF 40-watt G5 PAs different that G9's?
 
 
Roger Hansen, W6TOZ
Auburn, WA
 
p.s. the reason that I just didn't try it is that I don't want to fry anything just yet.   Smoke must be contained!!!!














Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to