I didn't mind the dynamotors ... servicing them wasn't a problem 
 either. 

  Neil 


Coy Hilton wrote:
> 
> Isn't it the truth. The MASTR PRO used to do .5uV / 20 db  on VHF
> with NO problem tuned by the book, but UHF was a bit touchier it
> took the added tuning devices of a few rubber fingers and several
> prairs to get .5uV. AND the UHF transmitters could get really nasty.
> AND we were thankful for EVERY tenth of a microvolt that we could
> get.
> OH Remember the PRogress Line.... and the PRE Progressline and how
> bout them TPLs (Tolet Paper Lines). I hated the dyno-motors.
> 73
> AC0Y
> 
> --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "skipp025" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Funny how spoiled we are over modern radio
> > equipment.  ".5uV is a bit deaf" just makes
> > me smile.
> >
> > That's not a bad number really, especially
> > since the Master Pro Receiver has such a
> > good front end.
> >
> > Better to have the .5uV and a well protected
> > front end, vs a "modestly protected" GasFet
> > preamp ahead of it.
> >
> > GaAs (Gas-Fets) make great mixers. One must
> > be carefull not to cause more receiver mix
> > problems with a nice GaAs Fet mixer, which
> > started life as a preamp.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Skipp
> >
> > www.radiowrench.com
> >
> > > Bob Dengler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Anyone had experience working with
> > > > the master pro on 220?
> > > > I discovered one thing, without a
> > > > preamp she's toast.
> > > > It needs a preamp big time.
> > > Even the unmodified Mastr Pros are a bit
> > > deaf on UHF (~0.5 uV for 20 dB quieting)
> > > ; preamps are required equipment for
> > > that RX IMO.  If the mod wasn't done well,
> > > it would be quite deaf.  How does it do
> > > with the preamp?
> > > Bob NO6B
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to