To paraphrase a saying: Birdies happen. Yes, it may have been more smart to put it what is usually a repeater input than an output. But, there are more expensive ham rigs with less well placed birdies - such as on the UHF satellite band.
BTW, I too agree that the tight front end is a feature, not a bug. It greatly helps reduce the chances of intermod/mixing. Joe M. DCFluX wrote: > > Yeah, It's one thing when the stuff in your house is doing it, but it > is completely different when it is the radio its self. I don't care > either way as I don't own a 202 anymore or like the crowd on the local > 76 machine > > On 6/1/05, mch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are many devices that generate signals on 146.760 MHz. It's just a > > fact of life - like cable TV interference on 145.250 MHz. At least the > > latter can be solved easily. I've had interference on 146.760 MHz on my > > radios since the late 70s with the release of the home PC. > > > > I would also debate that there are more repeaters on 146.760 MHz than > > any other pair. Even so, it's only one repeater pair. > > > > Joe M. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/