Ooops! I messed up the math. 15*8*.820 MHz is WAY too far away. That
would end up on 132.000 (not 133 MHz - that would be a mix with 157.820
MHz).
You're looking for something on 157.875 MHz, not 158.875 MHz as I stated
below. That is the input to an old IMTS pair, but it wasn't used in the
USA - only Canada. It may be used today for business.
Joe M.
mch wrote:
>
> 158.820 is too far away. That would mix to produce 133.000 MHz. You're
> looking for something on 158.875 MHz which would mix to end up on
> 132.940 MHz, but that's close enough to hear on 95 if the frequencies
> are a little off (145.41 is a little high and 158.875 is a little low).
>
> Joe M.
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
