At 08:02 AM 7/14/05, Ken Arck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >At 10:43 AM 7/14/2005 -0400, you wrote: > > >Perception is not a basis for a violation, it would seem that there may be >parts > >of the occurrence missing from the story. > ><---This occurs to me as well. It's hard to believe that he'd even be >charged without meeting more of the requisites of the statute. > >I don't think we have the whole story.... > >Ken
Well, FWIW.... Actual text of the law in question, plus a large photo of the car, is at <http://www.jars.net> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
