I had an FM76 convered to a 220Mhz repeater and used a GLB preselector in front of the receiver. It helped a lot. Unfortunately, the GLB is no longer available.
73, Joe,K1ike ---- skipp025 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Bob, > > The Midland & Clegg receivers would be stomped > on like a "narc at a biker rally"... at most > of the major high level sites where the noise > floor is mostly a disaster and the rf is intense. > > Nothing like a multi-kw FM Station or two, or > three or five nearby to let you know how good > a project builder you are. > > Once in a while you can get lucky using the > Midland & Clegg Radio Receivers at a more > quiet site. > > cheers, > skipp > > > > Bob Dengler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 7/29/2005 08:58 AM, you wrote: > > >Although the Clegg and Midland 13-509 radio mod to > > >repeater convertion works ok, the receiver is fairly > > >marginal for most busy repeater applications. You'd > > >do much better to buy a receiver designed for actual > > >repeater operation. > > > > I have to disagree. I maintain 2 220 MHz systems in SoCal: one > > is on top of a downtown LA highrise. Only thing between the > > RX & antenna is a notch duplexer. No desense or IMD. The > > other is about 10 miles north at a minor comm. site & does > > have a pass cavity in front of a GaAsFET preamp. No IMD > > there either, although the RX is a bit more sensitive of course. > > Both systems have been in service for over 25 years; only > > failure I know of between the two is that one RX had a cold > > solder joint on the 2nd LO xtal. > > Bob NO6B > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/