The coordinator in MI shouldn't object to a coordination from an adjacent
council just because their bandplans aren't identical. For better or worse,
there isn't a universal bandplan that satisfies the entire amateur community
nation-wide.
If there is nothing coordinated in MI that is going to be adversely affected
by the neighboring coordinator's proposed operation, then they have no
reason to object. If they do have something that would be affected (be it
of the same operation type or otherwise), then that's a different story.
That's the way we work here on the east coast among councils.
And yes, we have repeaters in the 440-442/445-447 range. Our aux link
subbands are all below 440.
--- Jeff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of TGundo 2003
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 12:44 PM
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Woohoo! The rocks are IN!
>
> IL Is doing 440-442 now as well. The problem IL has, and IN I
> imagine, is that Michigan will not recoginize any new
> coordinations in the 440-442 band, and instaead of providing
> useful data to IL when a request is submitted for new coord.,
> like MI had a link on that freq, they just say NO (or don't
> even respond from what I have heard) with no reason explained
> other than they will not recoginize a repeater coordinated
> there because it does not fit the bandplan. I fell victom to
> that with my first pair. We are close enough in northern IL
> that it is important to know what is coordinated in Mighigan.
> From what I hear MI dosen't play well with others so IL and
> some other states are ignoring them now and just dealing with
> the problems after the fact. In my opinion thats BS, but such
> is life. Not to mention the extra $100 I had to spend to
> re-crystal because michigan could't just say "no, we have a
> link there" instead of the blanket No. I think theres a
> commercia! l on TV with David Spade working at the MI
> repeater council right now ;)
>
> Sorry for the rant, off my soapbox now.
>
> Tom
> W9SRV
>
> Ken Arck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 12:09 PM 1/27/2006 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >Interesting that IN is assigning below 442. I was
> thinking about asking
> >around why Ohio doesn't assign repeaters or links
> between 440 and 442...
>
> <---Interestingly, Dave was assigned the same channel
> as one of my
> repeaters here in Oregon. Which, of course means, OR
> uses < 442 as well!
>
> Ken
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> President and CTO - Arcom Communications
> Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
> http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
> Authorized Dealer! s for Kenwood and Telewave and
> we offer complete repeater packages!
> AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
> http://www.irlp.net
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Yahoo! Mail.
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/mailstorage/*http://m
> ail.yahoo.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>
> * Visit your group "Repeater-Builder
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder> " on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> nsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
