Maybe Jeff or someone could explain the math here. I find it difficult 
to believe one needs to run 200 watts for reciprocal coverage to a 
typical mobile. And that's ignoring where I live, you'll never get 
frequency coordination for that much power anyway.

Chuck
WB2EDV




Kevin Custer wrote:

>
>> Gee- do you really need 150 watts?
>
>
> Most of the UHF installations I have seen, that employed a decent 
> receiver with preamp, could have easily used 150 + watts to be 
> matched.  I know of several GE Mastr II UHF 200 watt repeaters, using 
> good preamps, that are matched in performance with a 35 watt mobile.  
> They are single receiver systems using a duplexer and a single antenna.
>
> Jeff DePolo has one of these Mastr II, 200 watt UHF's at one of my 
> higher profile sites, and it works great with my 35 watt mobile.
>
> With multiple receiver sites on UHF, I'd consider a system with 3 - 
> 400 watts transmitter power; realizing you may not be able to duplex 
> with one antenna unless you have (1) a duplexer that will take the 
> power, (2) a tube amplifier to insure low TX sideband noise, (3) 
> enough duplexer isolation to protect the preamp, if used.
>
> YMMV
> Kevin Custer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>     *  Visit your group "Repeater-Builder
>       <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder>" on the web.
>        
>     *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>        
>     *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to