Would you want to believe 146.85 - 146.73 = 0.12 or 120 kHz? 

  Neil - WA6KLA 

---- Original Message ----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] That horrible noise
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:28:12 -0400

>Guys,
>
>I think you're missing one detail here. 146.73 minus 146.85 is 1200
>KHz.  Twice the typical 2 meter split of 600Khz.
>
>I'm not sure EXACTLY why it's happening, but the math here has BAD
>written all over it. Anytime you deal with multiples of your input 
>to output frequency separation, it's not a good thing.
>
>I wonder if the two repeaters are using the same PL tone? If so, 
>does one, or both encode that tone as well?
>
>This could help explain putting the repeater in PL not helping to
>eliminate the interference.
>
>I think Ken is on the right track with an audio delay causing a 
>howl. It's not a necessity however because of the RF delay in the 
>possible feedback path. Realize that even at the speed of light 
>(in free space) RF transmission and reception are not 
>instantaneous.
>
>I think your best bet is to find a different frequency or location
>for one of the repeaters if possible.
>
>Scott
>
>Scott Zimmerman
>Amateur Radio Call N3XCC
>612 Barnett Rd
>Boswell, PA 15531
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Ken Arck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 11:24 AM
>Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] That horrible noise
>
>
>> I'd be interested in hearing the wav file you recorded, Dave
>>
>> But bear in mind that your comment that it's not coming from either
>> repeater could easily be wrong. As a matter of fact, if you're
>running a
>> delay in the audio path of either repeater, one of them is most
>definately
>> involved. It sounds like a typical spur/mix/intermod issue to me,
>probably
>> involving a 3rd party.
>>
>> Anyway, let's have a listen.
>>
>> Ken
>>
>> At 02:55 PM 4/21/2006 -0000, you wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Two VHF repeaters in town have been bothered by this from time to
>>>time..  The first, which only occasionally gets it, but gets it
>LOUD
>>>when it happens, is 146.730-   The second (mine) at 146.850- is
>>>getting it almost continuously now, but weak, ranging from "will
>>>open squelch" (even with PL!) to "Will hold squelch but won't open
>>>it"  Unfortunately, it's putting enough energy out at low
>>>frequencies that the PL board is seeing a tone, so PL won't save
>me.
>>>
>>>
>>>The noise has an echoing quality that I think is VERY distinctive,
>>>but I can't figure where it's coming from.
>>>
>>>It's not happening in either repeater, we've had the opportunity to
>>>completely shut down the machines when it's happening.
>>>
>>>The two repeaters are maybe 1000' apart.
>>>
>>>I've only started having a problem with it since replacing my
>>>antenna so that I'm no longer stone deaf.
>>>
>>>I have a 5M wav file of the noise, if anyone's interested.
>>>It sounds like broadband noise at first, but then you notice
>>>the "feedback-ish" sound in it.  At times we've heard what seems
>>>like bits of audio in the noise.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>---------
>> President and CTO - Arcom Communications
>> Makers of the world famous RC210 Repeater Controller and
>accessories.
>> http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
>> Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave and
>> we offer complete repeater packages!
>> AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
>> http://www.irlp.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.0/269 - Release Date:
>2/24/2006
>>
>> 
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> 
>
>






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to