Do you know what gear they were using?  

I think I do remember using one near Indio, CA years ago, and it
sounded great.  Just like simplex (which it should.)  

73 de N1FNE

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, mch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There used to be Linear Translators that were land based. There was one
> around the Pittsburgh area. I'm sure somewhere there are a few left, but
> they are few and far between.
> 
> Joe M.
> 
> Rod Lane wrote:
> > 
> > I would hate to see your insightful comment missed.  I haven't seen
> > anyone else pick up on the part of your message about the linear
> > transponder.  If someone wants to pass many different modes through a
> > repeater, you can't do better than a transponder.  I've been on the
> > transmitting and receiving end of them for years with the satellite
> > world, and we haven't had to wholesale change out them with the change
> > from FM video to digital modes.  They just work.
> > 
> > Not being an expert on designing them, my understanding of the process
> > is as follows.
> > 
> > On a block level, they're much simpler than they seem.  Take a tightly
> > bandpass filtered IF from just about any quality radio, AGC it really
> > well, frequency convert it to the desired output frequency, run it
> > through a LINEAR power chain, and you now have the transponder.   A
> > simple RF envelope detector can act as the "squelch" so that the
> > output power chain isn't constantly running to amplify ambient noise
> > that wanders into the system's input bandpass.
> > 
> > The only other challenge is to be able to ID the repeater.   A simple
> > MCW oscillator somewhere in the chain, either at the IF frequency or
> > output fundamental, and you're legal.  FM, D-Star, P25, AM, CW, SSB
> > and virtually any mode that'll stay within the bandpass of the IF will
> > go through unimpeded ( and undistorted.)  One possible minor down side
> > is that the user's radio needs to be somewhat on-frequency.  If they
> > come in 1 KHz low, they go out 1 KHz low.  In theory, it's not the
> > repeater owner's problem, but can be noticed on the output.
> > 
> > I remember someone a few years back doing mods on a standard repeater
> > amplifier to "linearlize" it for ATV and SSB with some bias network
> > additions.  As long as the PA is reasonably linear, slight distortions
> > in the linearity curve shouldn't create huge issues except with modes
> > like QAM or other modes with serious amplitude-dependent requirements.
> > 
> > I wish I had the time.  Being an RF guy, not a software type, it
> > sounds like a great project.
> > 
> > 73 de N1FNE
> > 
> > --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Kris Kirby <kris@> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Steve Bosshard (NU5D) wrote:
> > > > Took a couple of antique GE Phoenix SX mobile radios. 
Programmed for
> > > > 442.0/ 447.0.  With TOT. Carrier Squelch - Took Receiver Un
Squelched
> > > > lead to PTT thru a one transistor keying transistor.
> > > >
> > > > Took VOL / SQ Hi and ran it thru a single common emitter stage -
> > > > bipolar amp and applied the collector output to the high side
of the
> > > > TX deviation control and set for +/- 1 Khz TXD.  Did have to
bypass
> > > > the emitter leg of the single stage amp and wallah - DSTAR
Repeater -
> > > > sort of.  Maybe P25 repeater too?  Simple - really do need to
> > > > regenerate the data signal and key on detected data with a CCD
> > chip to
> > > > give the preamble tone time to get thru.
> > >
> > > Excellent work Mr. Bosshard. This is one of the things that I've
wanted
> > > to explore with D-Star but haven't had the time. This approach also
> > > works for most other modes based on FM (9600 BPS packet,
Motorola DES,
> > > etc.).
> > >
> > > Truly, to support multiple modes or technologies, we need only
look at
> > > the world of linear transponders for a clue -- there's really
not much
> > > of a point in having too much of a radio there when you're just
> > > repeating in the input RF.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kris Kirby <kris@>
> > > "The illegal we do immediately.  The unconstitutional takes
> > >  a bit longer."                     -- Henry Kissinger
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> >
>


Reply via email to