Well, yeah our mountains sure can't compete with yours. Richard <http://www.n7tgb.net/> www.n7tgb.net
_____ From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 9:45 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Usage of Linked Repeater Systems vs. Stand Alone Repeaters On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:22 PM, Richard wrote: > Here it is mostly the opposite. People will use a club owned, > linked, high level, wide coverage system before using a low level > machine. Of the 2m low level machines, only one or two see limited > use. There are many UHF machines in the area, but they see almost no > use. > Yeah, I should clarify a bit. Our "mid-level" machines are at around 4,000' HAAT. Those sites are where the VHF linked system lives. The "high-site" is at 5,440' HAAT or so. So they're all "wide-area coverage" compared to out in the flatlands... -- Nate Duehr, WY0X [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:nate%40natetech.com> com
