The 210 group is different than the 110 group.

Joe M.

> WD7F - John in Tucson wrote:
> 
> Really?  I get mail from [RC210] rc210 at yahoogroups.com every day.
> Wonder what that's about.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: DCFluX
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 11:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RC110 Group
> 
> Yeah, he says the group has been dead for sometime. Anyway I cancelled
> the request.
> 
> On 1/25/08, WD7F - John in Tucson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>      Ken Arck - AH6LE
> 
>      de WD7F
>      John in Tucson
> 
>      ----- Original Message -----
>      From: Jim Brown
>      To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>      Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 8:36 AM
>      Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RC110 Group
> 
>      I tried to join several times a couple of years ago, and was
>      refused by the moderator.  My RC110 has been back to Ken Arc
>      and was returned still unreliable.  It will ocationally do a
>      reset while you are trying to enter a macro, and will
>      ocationally fail to turn on the audio to the link when it
>      keys up.  Mine has never worked and I gave up with no
>      support.  NHRC controllers work great!
> 
>      73 - Jim  W5ZIT
> 
>      DCFluX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>           Anyone know who runs the RC110 yahoo group? I've
>           been trying to sign
>           up but it seems it requires approval.
> 
>      ------------------------------------------------------------
>      Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
> 
>      ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>      No virus found in this incoming message.
>      Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>      Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1241 - Release
>      Date: 1/24/2008 9:58 AM
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.11/1243 - Release Date:
> 1/25/2008 11:24 AM
> 

Reply via email to