You're assuming they will. If it is guarded (and ANY control link should be guarded and not running CSQ), they should not be coming in the control link. But, your point is well taken.
I guess someone can break into the site and key your TX, too. It's really the same difference as if they hack into your control link. Joe M. Kevin Custer wrote: > > You are assuming that all users will be coming into the first crossband > equipment, but in reality, there may be users that come in on the > crosslink receiver, therefore, no ID would ever happen on that user at > the main transmitter. Also, if the crosslink were run in carrier > squelch, and noise or other such would trigger the transmitter site, no > ID would occur. If that transmitter comes up, for whatever reason, it > MUST be id'd to be perfectly legal. > > Besides, these days it cheaper to buy a real controller (like the small > ICS basic) than it is to buy a DTMF controller that has no ID functionality. > > Kevin > > MCH wrote: > > Why can the same ID not be used for both > > as long as it is part of the same system? > > > > Joe M. > > > > Kevin Custer wrote: > > > >> MCH wrote: > >> > >>> Are you talking about the ID aspect or the control (enable/disable TX) > >>> aspect? > >>> > >>> Joe M. > >>> > >>> > >> Both. > >> > >> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
