And watch the frequencies - don't have a 147.18 output and try and
run it with a 441 input.  Or a 146.64 output and try and run it with
a 439 link channel.

All it takes is one third harmonic to ruin your whole day.

Mike


At 06:14 AM 07/23/10, you wrote:
>John,
>
>You will get as many positive answers as you will negative. That said, the
>proper way would be 2 antennas and 2 runs of coax. If you already have the
>dual band antenna and want to go that route there are several things to
>watch out for. What is the power rating of your antenna? If you have 2
>repeaters putting out 100 watts into an antenna rated at 100 watts, you will
>damage the antenna. At the ground end, you will need a diplexer to split the
>single run of coax into one for each repeater. The diplexer will have the
>same power restrictions as the antenna. Without keeping these two
>restrictions in mind, you may spend more $$ the second time around.
>
>Jim
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "John" <fritzej...@gmail.com>
>To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 08:49
>Subject: [Repeater-Builder] adding a 3/4meter repeater to my site?
>
>
> >I am sure this is a stupid question, or it seems so to me, but I can't find
> >the answer anywhere.
> >
> > I am thinking about putting a 440 Mhz repeater (or link) for Packet at my
> > 2M repeater site.  Can I use the same coax and antenna (multi band) or do
> > I need a complete seperate run?  Hoping to save a chunk of change
> > ;-)  Of course I'll need seperate cavities and /or duplexer.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > John
> > K2QY
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Reply via email to