I have a pdf copy of the Moto Diplex Manual. If it s needed 
I can upload it somewhere.

73, Dick, W1KSZ


-----Original Message-----
>From: skipp025 <skipp...@yahoo.com>
>Sent: Aug 23, 2010 12:49 PM
>To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Diplex Antenna Manual
>
>Re: Motorola Diplex Antenna Manual 
>
>>> Scott Zimmerman wrote: 
>>> I would LOVE to know some of the theory behind 
>>> this method. I was hoping to use this on a remote 
>>> base antenna with 'Station' type antennas, but I
>>> don't think that will work since it clearly states 
>>> that "Only standard base-loaded antennas are used" 
>
>Looks like a straight forward scheme to isolate two ports
>with odd wave-length coax stubs. The paper says only one 
>of the stubs may be extended an extra half wave-length. 
>
>I suspect the restriction to base loaded coils forces each 
>of the antenna feed points to retain in forced physical 
>hardware something close to their (hopefully) 50 ohm drive 
>impedance at the F-center tuned frequency. That relatively 
>low Z value would hopefully be 1/4 line transformed into a 
>relatively high Z (impedance) value back at the T-Connector. 
>Some type of ensured feed-point decoupling requirement might 
>be involved/required. 
>
>>> Comments? Suggestions? Theory?
>
>I think we went through that already... 
>
>
>> "men...@..." <men...@...> wrote:
>> The Motorola document is based on the use of the Spectrun 
>> base loaded antennas sold by Mother. The Spectrum antenna 
>> is a series coil arrangement, not a shunt fed or tapped 
>> coil; this is very important! 
>
>I don't remember seeing any paperwork on the Spectrum Base 
>Loaded Antennas...  Out here on the west coast, "Mother" is 
>a Cookie Company (with decent but hard Oatmeal cookies). 
>
>I would expect the series coil antenna to be something similar 
>to a 3/4 wave or electrically shortened antenna system and the 
>shunt/tapped coils to be more 1/2 and 5/8 wave.  Why would a 
>series coil antenna be a requirement? 
>
>> The chart works quite well for the Spectrum antennas and 
>> will probably work for any other series fed LB coil.  It 
>> will not work for any antenna that is shunt fed as myself 
>> and several others found out when trying to make two 
>> non-Motorola antennas work on a fire engine.
>
>On Low Band with Utility Vehicles, I've found a number of 
>reasons why certain low band antennas don't work well. Depends 
>on each situation and I've recently had an install where only 
>a shunt fed antenna would work.  
>
>> The maker of the Untenna antennas told me once that they 
>> could be combined in the same way but the method was different; 
>> IIRC the antenna to T cables were to be quarterwaves but 
>> were for the opposing frequency.  Never tried it and that 
>> was a long time ago and no notes to back up my memory.
>
>> Another document exists that details using a ball mount 
>> full length whip and a Spectrum series fed LB base load 
>> in the same shared configuration.
>> Milt
>> N3LTQ
>
>Quickly looking at a Spectrum Antenna data sheet, I might 
>suspect they are trying to simulate/emulate/achieve a "no 
>ground plane" halve-wave operation for proper feed-line 
>decoupling. 
>
>got to go, back later... 
>
>s. 
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Reply via email to