attached is a patch to add a note explaining the rationale for
referring to services by their domain names, per:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00054.html
Index: software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.15 repo-criteria-evaluation.html
--- software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html 24 Jun 2021 23:55:41 -0000 1.15
+++ software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html 26 Jun 2021 20:18:10 -0000
@@ -16,6 +16,16 @@
coordinated by the <a href="//www.fsf.org">Free Software
Foundation</a>, and you are welcome to contribute.</p>
+<p>Note that these services are referred to by their domain names,
+rather than their common names (eg: savannah.gnu.org vs. Savannah).
+That is because the underlying software, running on most of these
+servers, is also available for self-hosting as Free Software.
+This list focuses primarily on the ethics of the service operators,
+rather than the properties of the server software;
+so it is important to emphasize that these criteria were applied
+only to each specific instance, operated by a specific organization.
+Only one of these criteria (A1) relates to the server software.</p>
+
<table class="listing" style="border: 0">
<thead>
<tr>
