I noticed there were a number of changes that we all agreed upon and that RMS OK'd, but which were never installed.
I've installed the easiest of those now: * Refer to repos by their domain name, together with an explanatory note: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00054.html> and <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00100.html> * github.com now fails C2 but passes C5: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00051.html> * gitlab.com now fails C0 (+ downgrade to F): <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00052.html> * Add evaluations of sr.ht and notabug.org: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00053.html> The changes to repo-criteria.html are more numerous and aren't as clear-cut. I couldn't find a single diff that incorporated all of those. I'll work on assembling one, but it might take me some time. -g -- Greg Farough // Campaigns Manager Free Software Foundation Join the FSF and help us defend software freedom: https://my.fsf.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature