On 15/12/2008, at 10:34 AM, Brett Porter wrote:

We can delete it in such a case, but we would highly recommend you release a new version, not overwrite the existing one, to avoid any future confusion.

I should clarify.

It's been pointed out to me that empty JARs is probably not serious enough to make an exception to the rules. While I'm hesitant to leave "junk" in the repository, it should be clear that replacing it is not an option because of the confusion that would occur if someone picks up the empty JARs from an older mirror.

You should definitely release under a new version. We won't remove anything for now, and I think you'd need to make a very strong case for it for it to happen.

As Brian pointed out, mvn deploy is the right way to go, and you might consider using the release and stage plugins to help manage the process and vet the artifacts before they end up in your synced repository as well.

HTH,
Brett

--
Brett Porter
[email protected]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Reply via email to