Ugh, thanks. Can you fire me the output of each of

dig NS grimoire.ca
dig +norecurse @a.ca-servers.ca NS grimoire.ca
dig +norecurse @ns1.linode.com NS grimoire.ca

from that machine so that I can identify which part of the delegation or expiry 
is hosed?

-o

On Jan 20, 2010, at 8:03 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:

> FYI is not propagated in the repo machine, although it is in my laptop
> 
> $ dig alchemy.grimoire.ca
> 
> ; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> alchemy.grimoire.ca
> ;; global options:  printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 53285
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
> 
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;alchemy.grimoire.ca.           IN      A
> 
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> alchemy.grimoire.ca.    45446   IN      CNAME   public.grimoire.ca.
> public.grimoire.ca.     2874    IN      A       76.10.176.194
> 
> ;; Query time: 29 msec
> ;; SERVER: 63.246.7.201#53(63.246.7.201)
> ;; WHEN: Wed Jan 20 19:00:30 2010
> ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 74
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Owen Jacobson
> <owen.jacob...@grimoire.ca> wrote:
>> It shouldn't be going anywhere near tor.packetflow.ca any more.
>> 
>> On Sunday I updated the DNS entry for alchemy.grimoire.ca from 76.10.176.194 
>> (its old home, connected to the internet via Teksavvy and packetflow.ca) to 
>> 69.164.211.26 (its new home, connected via nac.net). I can't find any DNS 
>> servers that are still caching the old IP address, but the expiry time for 
>> that entry was set to 86400 seconds, which has now long since elapsed. The 
>> only thing that I can think of is that something is hosed in my (well, mine 
>> or Linode's) DNS setup, preventing the synch script or the resolver on its 
>> host from noticing the changeover.
>> 
>> Thoughts? Observations?
>> 
>> (I am now subscribed to repo-maintainers. :)
>> 
>> -o
>> 
>> On Jan 20, 2010, at 7:50 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>> 
>>> yeah, you need to subscribe
>>> 
>>> the traceroute is stopping at
>>> 8  2120.tengigabitethernet-0-0-0.lns01.tor.packetflow.ca
>>> (69.196.136.79)  36.212 ms  37.496 ms  35.958 ms
>>> 9  * * *
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Owen Jacobson
>>> <owen.jacob...@grimoire.ca> wrote:
>>>> On Jan 20, 2010, at 7:01 PM, ma...@repo1.maven.org wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> --- Some repositories were not synchronized ---
>>>>> groupId: ca.grimoire
>>>>> Error:
>>>>> rsync: failed to connect to alchemy.grimoire.ca: No route to host (113)
>>>>> rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(122) 
>>>>> [receiver=3.0.3]
>>>>> Error synchronizing metadata. Exit code: 10
>>>>> Command line executed: /bin/sh -c "rsync --include=*/ 
>>>>> --include=**/maven-metadata.xml* --exclude=* 
>>>>> --exclude-from=/home/maven/bin/synchronize/syncopate/exclusions.txt 
>>>>> -Lrtivz rsync://alchemy.grimoire.ca/m2/releases/ca/grimoire/ 
>>>>> /home/maven/repository-staging/to-ibiblio/maven2/ca/grimoire/"
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue Jan 19, 2010, at 2:11 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Ping is working from Central, so lets see if the next sync is ok.
>>>> 
>>>> Nope, looks like it isn't.
>>>> 
>>>> Let me know if you need anything from me on this -- please CC me on 
>>>> replies, too, since I don't subscribe to repo-maintainers (but I probably 
>>>> should).
>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to