Your message dated Sat, 27 Aug 2011 14:55:31 +0200
with message-id 
<capdtaj1i_nvjjhm2rjmbhyboxxzevbre6j07emagjh0q1dj...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#604842: while using reportbug for linux-image, 
reportbug claims it is not installed
has caused the Debian Bug report #604842,
regarding while using reportbug for linux-image, reportbug claims it is not 
installed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
604842: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604842
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug
Version: 4.12.6
Severity: minor

The following excerpt of conversation with reportbug should explain
the point
0% reportbug
Please enter the name of the package in which you have found a problem, or type 
'other' to
report a more general problem.
> linux-image
linux-image package has been removed, use linux-2.6 instead (replaced here 
automatically).
*** Welcome to reportbug.  Use ? for help at prompts. ***
Detected character set: UTF-8
Please change your locale if this is incorrect.

Using 'fulvio ciriaco <[email protected]>' as your from address.
Getting status for linux-2.6...
No matching source or binary packages.
A package named "linux-2.6" does not appear to be installed; do you want to 
search for a
similar-looking filename in an installed package [Y|n|q|?]? n

0% dpkg -l "linux-image*"
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name              Version           Description
+++-=================-=================-==================================================
un  linux-image       <none>            (no description available)
un  linux-image-2.6   <none>            (no description available)
un  linux-image-2.6-4 <none>            (no description available)
un  linux-image-2.6-6 <none>            (no description available)
un  linux-image-2.6-6 <none>            (no description available)
un  linux-image-2.6-a <none>            (no description available)
un  linux-image-2.6-k <none>            (no description available)
un  linux-image-2.6-o <none>            (no description available)
un  linux-image-2.6-v <none>            (no description available)
un  linux-image-2.6-v <none>            (no description available)
un  linux-image-2.6-x <none>            (no description available)
ii  linux-image-2.6.3 2.6.32-27         Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs
ii  linux-image-686   2.6.32+28         Linux for modern PCs (meta-package)

Fulvio
-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
EDITOR="emacs -nw -Q"
INTERFACE="text"

** /home/fc/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "4.12.6"
mode standard
ui text
email "[email protected]"
smtphost "smtp.gmail.com"
smtpuser "[email protected]"
smtptls

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii  apt                     0.8.8            Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  python                  2.6.6-3+squeeze1 interactive high-level object-orie
ii  python-reportbug        4.12.6           Python modules for interacting wit

reportbug recommends no packages.

Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
pn  debconf-utils        <none>              (no description available)
pn  debsums              <none>              (no description available)
pn  dlocate              <none>              (no description available)
ii  emacs23-bin-common   23.2+1-5.1          The GNU Emacs editor's shared, arc
ii  exim4-daemon-light [ 4.72-2              lightweight Exim MTA (v4) daemon
ii  file                 5.04-5              Determines file type using "magic"
ii  gnupg                1.4.10-4            GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep
ii  python-gtk2          2.17.0-4            Python bindings for the GTK+ widge
pn  python-gtkspell      <none>              (no description available)
pn  python-urwid         <none>              (no description available)
pn  python-vte           <none>              (no description available)
ii  xdg-utils            1.0.2+cvs20100307-2 desktop integration utilities from

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.1

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 23:34, Sandro Tosi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi fulvio,
> thanks for your bug report.
>
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 19:59, fulvio ciriaco <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The following excerpt of conversation with reportbug should explain
>> the point
>> 0% reportbug
>> Please enter the name of the package in which you have found a problem, or 
>> type 'other' to
>> report a more general problem.
>>> linux-image
>> linux-image package has been removed, use linux-2.6 instead (replaced here 
>> automatically).
>> *** Welcome to reportbug.  Use ? for help at prompts. ***
>> Detected character set: UTF-8
>> Please change your locale if this is incorrect.
>>
>> Using 'fulvio ciriaco <[email protected]>' as your from address.
>> Getting status for linux-2.6...
>> No matching source or binary packages.
>> A package named "linux-2.6" does not appear to be installed; do you want to 
>> search for a
>> similar-looking filename in an installed package [Y|n|q|?]? n
>
> What's happening here is:
>
> - 'linux-image' is automatically converted to 'linux-2.6'
> - 'linux-2.6' is searched in the binary packages list, but not found
> - then the source packages list is searched (and 'linux-2.6' would
> have been found there) but there's no Sources file on your machine (no
> deb-src in /etc/apt/sources.list)
> - the search fails, as shown above.
>
> I'm still wondering what to do in the case of linux-2.6, maybe I'll
> have to "whitelist" it somehow, or just leave things as they are and
> document it, let's wait a bit and see how it goes :)

This has been closed with #619870: now the currently running kernel
package is selected (so it's a bin pkg).

Regards,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi


--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Reportbug-maint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint

Reply via email to