Your message dated Sun, 28 Aug 2011 01:00:39 +0200
with message-id
<capdtaj1l29ca4-cgkznd74wmfnzxefwuh5k3okrgmjgopzy...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#259456: epoch problem with incoming worth fixing?
has caused the Debian Bug report #259456,
regarding reportbug does not handle epochs correctly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
259456: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=259456
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libmyspell3
Version: 1:3.1-6
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages libmyspell3 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.4-3 GCC support library
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
package fails to install because libgcc1 is uninstallable
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:12, Sandro Tosi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Rene,
> nice a precise 1-year ping :)
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 23:59, Sandro Tosi <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Rene,
>> I need some help here :)
>>
>> Could you please explain what's the problem here? I can't get it
>> reading (twice) the bug log. Are you requesting to strip the epoch
>> from the Version pseudo-header? else?
>
> I've re-read the bug report again, and if I got it right this time, it
> seems the check of packages in incoming is retrieving the version
> without the epoch, but then compares the version of teh installed
> package, that it has the epoch, hence it seems the new package has a
> lower version than the one installed - is that correct?
closing
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Reportbug-maint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
