On 6/9/09 4:25 PM, Chris McDonough wrote: > Tres was after the same thing earlier today so I think it's a good idea. > > We could also change the PersistentApplicationFinder to look in the > environment > for an open connection and use it instead of trying to open one itself.
(FTR, I didn't mean *instead* of opening one itself, I mean as logic that looks in the environ for an open one, falling back to opening one itself.) > > On 6/9/09 4:16 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have been working with repoze.zodbconn (in conjunction with repoze.bfg >> and Karl 3) and there have been several times when I wish I could just >> insert some WSGI component that does something with the ZODB connection. >> Specifically: >> >> - At one point I wanted repoze.who.plugins.zodb to use the same >> connection as the application uses. We shouldn't have to set up the >> ZODB connection twice on every request. The cost is low but measurable. >> >> - I wanted to create a WSGI logger that watches how many objects are >> loaded or stored by the handler for a request. >> >> - Right now, I want to fine-tune the contents of the ZODB cache after >> every request. >> >> To make tasks like these easier, I would like to add to repoze.zodbconn >> a WSGI framework component that opens a ZODB connection, puts that >> connection in the WSGI environment, calls the next WSGI app in the >> chain, then closes the same ZODB connection on the way out. I intend to >> add it myself, but I would like to hear any feedback the group might >> have before I do it. >> >> Shane >> _______________________________________________ >> Repoze-dev mailing list >> Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org >> http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > Repoze-dev mailing list > Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org > http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev > _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
