On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Tres Seaver<tsea...@palladion.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Forgot to CC the list.
>
> - -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Repoze-dev] Plan for repoze.zodbconn
> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:48:40 -0400
> From: Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com>
> To: Chris Rossi <ch...@archimedeanco.com>
> References: <4a2ec333.5020...@hathawaymix.org>
> <4a328239.9000...@palladion.com>
> <60bf02c00906120936n2ea38495xd9a2393191458...@mail.gmail.com>
>
> Chris Rossi wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from me.
>>>
>>>
>> +1 from me. Also +1 for managing the transaction at this level, if
>> feasible.
>
> I think I'd rather leave the transaction handling to repoze.tm{,2}: for
> instance, it might be that an app which only used repoze.who didn't need
> any transaction management at all, whereas other apps might need to
> coordinate the transaction at different points.
>
+1 for letting repoze.tm{,2} handle transactions.
I think that's a pretty good pattern for transactional apps
(relational or not) to expose their connection through the environ and
have repoze.tm to do the transaction dance.
-Fernando
_______________________________________________
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
