2009/6/25 Iain Duncan <iaindun...@telus.net>: > For me personally (admittedly a totally new user to zope/repoze) it's a > negative to have bfg moving to share fewer components with Pylons, as > one of the main attractions to me of bfg is it's complementary nature to > pylons. And conversely, one of the turn offs for me re Django as the > rampant not-invented-here aspect.
Perhaps what Chris is cooking up could be split up into a separate package; it seems to me that the motivation is that the Routes implementation could be improved upon, both in terms of performance and code quality. I could be wrong. \malthe _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
