On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 16:12 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Malthe Borch wrote: > > 2009/7/2 Tim Hoffman <t...@zute.net>: > >> I think you woul lose that capability with just name based registrations. > > > > Yes, but perhaps for the better; it was always problematic to use > > component adaptation to create specialized views based on the iro, > > because of the order of adaptation, e.g. with viewlets: > > > > context, request, view, manager > > > > You will easily run into situations where you need to do a lot of > > seeming superflouous component registrations because you've > > specialized on ``context``, say. > > > > I think there is a better scheme out there which does not rely in this > > way on multi-adaptation. > > The fact that multi-adaptation can be hard doesn't mean it can't also be > useful: I don't see *any* way to achieve Tim's goals without something > like an IRO.
Excuse my ignorance, but what is an IRO here? thanks iain _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
