I will add only anecdotally, that I've taken a customer from 3.1 up to 3.3.2 with repoze and the repoze piece has posed no issues. It's a little clunky, but it works. I look forward to WSGI integrated into the core Zope/Plone stack.
Chris On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> wrote: > Hi. > > I'm not a representative of the Repoze project, so I'll just share my > personal view. > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 9:23 PM, ken manheimer <ken.manhei...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> these seem to be likely questions if you're interested in adoption of >> repoze.plone by the wider plone community. please let me know if i'm >> misunderstanding something basic, or if i've missed somewhere that covers >> the issues... > > repoze.zope2 and .plone have been written largely by Agendaless for > the KARL project. That project has gone through another iteration and > nowadays uses repoze.bfg without any Plone instead. While there are > some individual users of the repoze.plone approach, there's currently > no driving party behind it anymore. > > Now it's perfectly possible to use most of the software with > up-to-date versions of Zope2 and Plone, but this setup isn't > particular well documented or explained anywhere. The entire stack is > however production proven and there's no doubt about its quality. > > At this point I see repoze.zope2 / .plone as a prototype for a full > WSGI integration into Zope2. It's likely not going to see major > adoption in its current form. It's more likely that the lessons > learned from this project will be merged back in some form into Zope2 > itself, providing it with an OOTB WSGI story. If everything goes well, > I hope to see Plone have official WSGI support in the future. The > timeline for that is probably Zope 2.13 or later and Plone 5.0 with a > final release somewhere in 2011 or 2012. With such a long timeframe > there's obviously lots of unknowns. > > In this situation it's up to every user to decide if the benefits of > the WSGI approach outweigh the costs of going with a non-standard > approach. As always you can make a difference by getting involved and > driving this project forward yourself ;-) > > Hanno > _______________________________________________ > Repoze-dev mailing list > Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org > http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev > _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
