awesome, thanks! On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Wichert Akkerman <wich...@wiggy.net> wrote:
> On 4/21/10 11:23 , Chris McDonough wrote: > > The spelling: > > > > <route name="route-name" path="/some/path" view=".some.view"/> > > > > Is syntactic candy that can also be spelled like this: > > > > <route name="route-name" path="/some/path"/> > > <view view=".some.view" route_name="route-name"/> > > > > So you can probably do this: > > > > <route name="route-name" path="/some/path"/> > > > > <view view=".some.view" route_name="route-name" > > wrapper="some-other-view"/> > > <view view=".some.other_view" route_name="route-name" > > name="some-other-view"/> > > > > I haven't tried this, but I'm pretty sure it will work. > > It does if you do the same thing in python. > > Wichert. > _______________________________________________ > Repoze-dev mailing list > Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org > http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev >
_______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
