I suppose my issue with adding getall to the thing: if getall needs to behave like it does in a normal webob request and multiple values for each key need to be kept around, you might as well just use a normal one. Or, as Fergus did, subclass.
- C On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 22:23 +0000, Fergus Doyle wrote: > I ended up subclassing DummyRequest to add the functionality where i needed > it (I had a number of other aspects to add to the class due to the app setup, > so it wasn't too painful) > > I suppose it can't be a bad thing to resemble webob.Request as closely as > possible? > > On 4 Nov 2010, at 12:40, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > > Since the issue tracker on bfg.repoze.org is still broken I'm posting > > this here. > > > > I ran into a little problem today: I was adding some tests for a > > function which uses request.POST.getall(), but it turns out that > > repoze.bfg.testing.DummyRequest uses a plain dict for POST instead of a > > WebOb multidict, so .getall() is not available. > > > > Wichert. > > _______________________________________________ > > Repoze-dev mailing list > > Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org > > http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Repoze-dev mailing list > Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org > http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev > _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
