Tres Seaver <tsea...@agendaless.com> added the comment:

Thanks for the report!  I agree that your suggested solution is probably
the correct one, with the exception that I would have it apply 'list()'
only for results which were generators:  hmm, how do I detect that?

----------
assignedto:  -> tseaver
nosy: +tseaver
status: unread -> chatting

__________________________________
Repoze Bugs <b...@bugs.repoze.org>
<http://bugs.repoze.org/issue169>
__________________________________
_______________________________________________
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev

Reply via email to