[keeping Domenico in CC until he asks to be dropped] > │ │ │ │ - Build ID: 6f3f14da239d0b68ba179ee7a2f2570c4d970db0 > │ │ │ │ + Build ID: c68caf4dba0ea46c05dddf9405bda4290c6ceaa6
I was under the (possibly-false!) impression that this was a symptom rather than anything like a cause. In other words, this might be just the same way of saying that (for example) the checksums of the .debs differ; well of course they do; the package is not unreproducible yet! To be clear, I am not saying that the package is reproducible or this warrants no further investigation, it just might be a red herring to assume it was 100% debug symbol related. Just throwing that out there in case it might save you some unnecessary brain cycles. If it helps, the first thing I would check is how exactly one can get this "Build ID" to vary; is it always the same values with those specific build-paths for example, or is it entirely deterministic? That would quickly eliminate a whole plethora of incorrect avenues. > There's also a page listing the issues on tests.reproducible-builds.org, > but I can't access that right now... For completeness, this is now back: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/index_issues.html Best wishes, -- ⚫ ⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb ⚫ ⚫ reproducible-builds.org ⬊ ⬋ ⚫ _______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
