On 2020-06-07, Samuel Henrique wrote: > Polybar currently FTBFS on tests.reproducible-builds.org because of a > timeout[0] while it builds without an issue on buildd[1] and > salsa-ci[2].
More accurately, it Fails to Build Reproducibly; both builds typically succeed do succeed, although diffoscope times out pretty consistantly: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/polybar.html > Its builds are quite CPU Intensive but I believe there might be > something wrong going on as a timeout seems like too much. More what I was noticing is the usual 2+ hour build times on tests.reproducible-builds.org, whereas polybar builds in 3-5 minutes on buildd.debian.org (even for slowish architectures). It's not uncommon for our builds to take longer since it's doing two builds... Oh, the diffoscope timeout is 120m ... so that would more-or-less explain it why the "build" takes 2+ hours... Though I built polybar using reprotest, and it completed in ~22minutes, including two builds and running diffoscope. > I would like to clear this issue out before continuing with debugging > the lack of reproducibility[3]. The diffoscope output from my test with reprotest: https://people.debian.org/~vagrant/reproducible/polybar.diffoscope.out.gz live well, vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
