On 2023-07-25, Peter B wrote: > /"We had a few glitches after the bookworm released, but I *think* they > should be sorted out by now... FTBFS do get > rescheduled fairly often, and if you really need, they can be manually > rescheduled (if you are a debian developer, you > should be able to click on the triangle of arrows to reschedule)./" > > Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@reproducible-builds.org > Thu Jun 22 18:25:48 BST 2023 > (I was not subscribed at the time) ... > I have several packages FTBFS from over a month ago. No sign of any reruns. > (One got fixed when I uploaded a new version.)
according to: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/index_performance.html Looks like the whole archive is rebuilt roughly every 2 to 2.5 months. As you noticed, new versions get priority, and FTBFS *should* get scheduled more often, as well... but who knows, sometimes things fall into cracks... > Wondering if there is any chance for maintainers without an SSO sign-on > to be able to schedule reruns for their own packages? At the moment, I do not believe so. I think sso.debian.org will eventually be retired and so another option will need to be explored at some point... You can also try asking for a few specific ones to be rescheduled by dropping by irc.oftc.net #debian-reproducible or asking for specific packages to be rescheduled on via this mailing list. If your packages are hosted on salsa.debian.org, you can also use the CI pipelines, which includes reprotest testing: https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/blob/master/README.md It is not the same as our tests.reproducible-builds.org infrastructure, but should help identify most issues before uploading to Debian! live well, vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
