Hi! We were discussions the restrictions on buildinfo identifiers:
fweb_1.62-12+b2_brahms-20120530T114812Z.buildinfo
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
this part
The proposal was “the string should consist only of alphanumeric
characters and hyphens”. Guillem made the following comment while
reviewing the patches for dpkg:
Guillem Jover:
> Can we just simply use the package name rules instead? It also avoids
> potential problems with case and similar. (There's a
> pkg_name_is_illegal function in Dpkg::Package already.)
After reaching out to Ansgar with a patch for dak to implement the
above, he replied:
Ansgar Burchardt:
> The allowed sets for package names and the suffix of buildinfo
> filenames won't be the same even with that change. However currently
> the suffix of buildinfo filenames matches what is allowed for .changes
> files.
>
> I'm not sure why allowing capital letters used in the suffix of
> buildinfo files should be an issue? After all we allow capital letters
> for both version numbers (part of the filename) and in names of changes
> files.
>
> (In the other direction not everything allowed as a package name can be
> used as the suffix of .changes and .buildinfo files either.)
Guillem, any further comments? Do you have any strong opposition to the
initial proposal?
--
Lunar .''`.
lu...@debian.org : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'`
`-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
