Michael R. Crusoe wrote: > It looks fixed on my end; thanks! > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/rb-pkg/testing/armhf/khmer.html
Yep! khmer will now only build its arch-dep and -indep binaries on amd64. https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/unstable/armhf/index_not_for_us.html now has 255 packages, up from 249. So there weren't many cases of this really. https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/unstable/amd64/index_not_for_us.html now has 90 packages, up from 85. One new one is: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fso-frameworkd&suite=unstable which didn't actually FTBFS on amd64, but it only produces armel and arch:all binaries, so it is quite reasonable that this is now only built and tested for reproducibility on armhf. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
