Hi, On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 05:54:13 -0200 Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, 02 Aug 2016 22:49:00 +0200 Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > > But then on IRC, HW42 suggested to approach this problem differently. > > Instead of integrating the functionality of figuring out the right > > repositories to reproduce the contents of a buildinfo file into sbuild, > > write a tool that can drive any package builder (like pbuilder).
there seems to be a conceptual problem with such an approach. For binNMUs, the full changelog entry has to be passed to sbuild or pbuilder. How does one best pass such a multi-line value via command line options? Would the best way to pass the changelog entry via the .buildinfo file? And if pbuilder and sbuild then already are parsing the .buildinfo file, would it not be better for the debrebuild machinery to be implemented by either in the first place? Thanks! cheers, josch
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
