Hi Holger et. al.,
> > This idea is similar to hardening-wrapper. That is now deprecated, but was
> > useful as a stepping-stone to more "proper" fixes. Likewise, this shouldn't
> > be thought of as "the proper fix", [...]
>
> when reading this at first, I didnt like the idea of working it around as you
> described
Same.. :(
> […] but then you have a valid point with hardening-wrapper
Hm, I'm not entirely convinced. Whilst h-w *did* exist, it not only stuck
around far too long, I fear that a parallel reproducibile-wrapper will stick
around even longer and be even harder still to eventually deprecate as it
will be used a lot more due to Policy pushes and/or general buzz around
getting one's packages reproducible.
It's also — and this should go without saying — unspeakably ugly!
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
_______________________________________________
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
