On 2017-09-24, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 07:14:22PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: >> Naturally, please let know if there are other things like this. > > What I was about, is that the sentence implies that what's *right after* > is all the changelog of the release, which is not right. > I've committed a change to the template, could you please check it out > whether it looks alright to you?
It does appear to imply that all the following changes are actually in the released version, which I don't think is actually correct. For example, I don't think "--auto-build" was part of reprotest 0.7, even if it was committed in the same week 0.7 was released ... ideally there would be an automated way to distinguish between commits not included in the released version and those that are. Looking at: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/misc.git/tree/reports/bin/generate-draft.template?id=c1a30a0 I guess referencing the changelog helps, though who actually follows links? :) live well, vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
