❦ 4 octobre 2017 08:03 +0100, Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org> : >> Fixing our clojure package would only solve the issue for Debian. > > Sure, but why don't we patch Debian's version of clojure whilst we wait > for upstream to "catch up"? :-)
FWIW, I agree with Apollon. >= is better than > as the resolution of the
timestamp can be coarced. I am also worried Clojure may not be the only
one using this. For example, Python may use the same thing for pyc (just
checked, it doesn't, it uses not(>=)). We don't ship pyc in packages,
but there may be other things like that.
--
Make sure comments and code agree.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
