John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:01:54AM -0800, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > > John Sonnenschein wrote: > > >Sorry to butt in here, but I was under the impression that code should > > >never make reference to the bug it fixes. Am I mistaken here? > > > > Normally yes. However in this case, I think since the "workaround" may > > need some explanation, its not a bad idea to reference it. > > The correct CR is: > > 6379193 ctfconvert needs to support VLA for gcc's DWARF > > (which I just duped the new one to)
Are you sure this is the same bug ? VLAs appear to work now with gcc builds in the case that the size is defined via an arithmetric expression... ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;)
