Alexander Indenbaum wrote:
> Garrett,
>
> I'll get back to you with the tracking numbers as soon as I get those.
>
> I'm pretty clear with Sun Contributor Agreement number since I faxed it and
> expect human intervention to finish the process. Is there any way to track
> the progress?
>
Not that I know of. You could try e-mailing Bonnie Corwin. But at this
point, I'd just sit tight for a day or two. If you've not heard back by
Friday, then we'll escalate.
> I'm a little bit confused about CR# though. I expected to get id upon bug
> submission, but I got success message from web GUI without any id. Is it
> normal? Should I resubmit the bug once I have Sun Contributor Agreement
> number?
>
No. Its normal and a result of the fact that there is an intermediate
human step. Your initial submission goes into a triage queue, and a
human checks it before filing a "real" bug on your behalf. Its an
annoying artifact of the fact that bug tracking database is not public,
and that we don't have a way to automatically vet CR submissions.
You should get an e-mail response in a day or two.
- Garrett
> Alexander Indenbaum
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Garrett D'Amore [mailto:garrett at damore.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 5:36 PM
>> To: Alexander Indenbaum
>> Cc: request-sponsor at opensolaris.org; 'Nick Bhavsar'
>> Subject: Re: Tehuti OpenSolaris drivers
>>
>> Once I know the CR number (which has yet to be assigned, due to the way
>> the triage system works, which mere mortals like myself don't fully
>> understand...) I'll be happy to act as your sponsor for this case.
>>
>> You should get an e-mail message in the next day or two with the CR
>> number. Please respond with the CR number, and then we'll have to get
>> you added to the list of outstanding CRs.
>>
>> Also, you'll need to know your Sun Contributor Agreement number. As I
>> understand that you have faxed it in, you need to get back the number.
>> Once you have got a response from that, please let us know your SCA# as
>> well as the CR #.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -- Garrett
>>
>> Alexander Indenbaum wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've submitted a bug/RFE with Synopsis "Tehuti 10GbE support in
>>> OpenSolaris".
>>>
>>> We have a year old ALPHA quality GLDv3 based driver, which was tested
>>> on SunOS 5.10 Generic_Patch_118844-30 powered by amd64. We produced
>>> the driver based on Nevada b40 GLDv3 header file using Sun C 5.7 Patch
>>> 117837-04 compiler. The driver provides fully functional full duplex
>>> TCP/IP network interface. The release is stable enough to support
>>> iperf stress tool.
>>>
>>> Solaris Driver Known Issues List:
>>>
>>> None what so ever? :)
>>>
>>> . VLAN hardware offload interface not implemented
>>>
>>> . Big Endian CPU architecture is not supported
>>>
>>> . Multicast filtering hardware offload interface not implemented
>>>
>>> . Only one port is supported
>>>
>>> . NDD Solaris management interface not implemented
>>>
>>> . RX performance is far from optimal
>>>
>>> Our main development platform is Linux and its driver provides all the
>>> mentioned missing features and good performance. The Linux driver is
>>> open source and could be used as reference implementation:
>>>
>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-
>>>
>> 2.6.24.git;a=commitdiff;h=54406a1c0281af619e4d90bd7e719562be90216e
>>
>>> We ready to release driver sources under CDDL license and it could be
>>> cool if Tehuti driver could be a part of OpenSolaris base distribution.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Alexander Indenbaum
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
